π© LendingArch Investigation
π§Ύ The Highest Level of Proof
This case was resolved by the Alberta Securities Commission through a formal settlement agreement (2020 ABASC 62) involving:
- LendingArch Financial Inc.
- OmniArch Capital Corporation
- Multiple executives and related companies
βοΈ 1. Key Outcome: They Admitted Breaching Securities Laws
This is critical:
π The respondents explicitly admitted they:
- Violated Alberta securities laws
- Made misleading statements to investors
- Failed to disclose critical financial information
- Acted contrary to the public interest
π₯ 2. What Actually Happened (Confirmed Facts)
π° $127 MILLION Raised from Investors
Through bond offerings (10% returns promised)
Marketed as investing in mortgage-backed securities (RMBS)
π© Funds Were Redirected (Undisclosed)
Instead of using funds as promised:
Millions were diverted into related companies
Confirmed Transfers:
$6.27M → OmniArch Ventures
$2.57M → personal holding company
$778K → media company
$405K → real estate company
π Then:
$4M+ of that flowed directly into LendingArch
β οΈ Critical Finding:
These loans were NOT disclosed to investors
π§ Why That Matters
Investors were told:
Funds would go into mortgage-backed securities
Reality:
Funds were redirected internally to companies owned by the same people
π That is the definition of:
material misrepresentation
π 3. Misleading Claims (Proven)
The settlement confirms:
β False / Misleading Statements About:
Management experience
Use of funds
Compensation structures
Example:
Executives claimed strong finance backgrounds
Reality: no formal training or credentials
π 4. The LendingArch Connection (Direct)
From the settlement:
LendingArch is explicitly described as:
“an online business which refers borrowers to lenders for a fee”
It received over $4M from these undisclosed related-party loans
π This is not indirect.
π This is direct financial linkage
βοΈ 5. Penalties & Restrictions (Severe)
π€ Individuals:
Jay Modi
20-year market ban
$500,000 penalty
Arti Modi
10-year ban
$180,000 penalty
Rajeev Singh
3-year ban
$115,000 penalty
π’ Companies (Including LendingArch):
π« Permanent Restrictions:
- Cannot freely raise capital
- Cannot act as investment issuers
- Cannot operate normally in securities markets
π LendingArch specifically agreed to:
- Permanent limitations on capital-raising
- Restrictions on financial activity
- Oversight when engaging in regulated transactions
π΄ 6. The Pattern (Now Proven, Not Alleged)
Across all documents:
2010–2015 $127M raised from investors
2014–2016 Undisclosed related-party loans
2016 Insolvency (CCAA – EY oversight)
2017 Fraud allegations (ASC application)
2020 Settlement with admissions of misconduct
π¨ FINAL DEALHELP VERDICTβCONFIRMED HIGH-RISK ENTITY
This is no longer:
“Bad reviews”
“Complaints”
“Allegations”
π This is:
β Admitted misconduct
β Regulatory penalties
β Investor harm exposure
β Direct financial ties to LendingArch
π Consumer Warning (Simple Version)
If you're considering using LendingArch:
β οΈ Understand:
It is a lead-generation platform (not a lender)
It has documented ties to a securities misconduct case
It received funds from undisclosed internal transactions
π§ What You Should Do Instead
βοΈ Apply directly with known lenders
βοΈ Avoid platforms that resell your data
βοΈ Verify who actually funds your loan
βοΈ Get a second opinion before signing anything
