๐Ÿšฉ LendingArch Investigation


๐Ÿงพ The Highest Level of Proof


This case was resolved by the Alberta Securities Commission through a formal settlement agreement (2020 ABASC 62) involving:


  • LendingArch Financial Inc.
  • OmniArch Capital Corporation
  • Multiple executives and related companies


โš–๏ธ 1. Key Outcome: They Admitted Breaching Securities Laws


This is critical:


๐Ÿ‘‰ The respondents explicitly admitted they:


  • Violated Alberta securities laws
  • Made misleading statements to investors
  • Failed to disclose critical financial information
  • Acted contrary to the public interest


๐Ÿ”ฅ 2. What Actually Happened (Confirmed Facts)


๐Ÿ’ฐ $127 MILLION Raised from Investors

Through bond offerings (10% returns promised)

Marketed as investing in mortgage-backed securities (RMBS)


๐Ÿšฉ Funds Were Redirected (Undisclosed)


Instead of using funds as promised:


Millions were diverted into related companies


Confirmed Transfers:


$6.27M → OmniArch Ventures

$2.57M → personal holding company

$778K → media company

$405K → real estate company


๐Ÿ‘‰ Then:


$4M+ of that flowed directly into LendingArch


โš ๏ธ Critical Finding:


These loans were NOT disclosed to investors


๐Ÿง  Why That Matters


Investors were told:


Funds would go into mortgage-backed securities


Reality:


Funds were redirected internally to companies owned by the same people


๐Ÿ‘‰ That is the definition of:


material misrepresentation


๐Ÿ“‰ 3. Misleading Claims (Proven)


The settlement confirms:


โŒ False / Misleading Statements About:


Management experience

Use of funds

Compensation structures


Example:


Executives claimed strong finance backgrounds

Reality: no formal training or credentials


๐Ÿ” 4. The LendingArch Connection (Direct)


From the settlement:


LendingArch is explicitly described as:


“an online business which refers borrowers to lenders for a fee”


It received over $4M from these undisclosed related-party loans


๐Ÿ‘‰ This is not indirect.

๐Ÿ‘‰ This is direct financial linkage


โš–๏ธ 5. Penalties & Restrictions (Severe)


๐Ÿ‘ค Individuals:


Jay Modi

20-year market ban

$500,000 penalty


Arti Modi

10-year ban

$180,000 penalty


Rajeev Singh

3-year ban

$115,000 penalty


๐Ÿข Companies (Including LendingArch):


๐Ÿšซ Permanent Restrictions:


  • Cannot freely raise capital
  • Cannot act as investment issuers
  • Cannot operate normally in securities markets


๐Ÿ‘‰ LendingArch specifically agreed to:


  • Permanent limitations on capital-raising
  • Restrictions on financial activity
  • Oversight when engaging in regulated transactions


๐Ÿ”ด 6. The Pattern (Now Proven, Not Alleged)


Across all documents:


2010–2015 $127M raised from investors

2014–2016 Undisclosed related-party loans

2016 Insolvency (CCAA – EY oversight)

2017 Fraud allegations (ASC application)

2020 Settlement with admissions of misconduct


๐Ÿšจ FINAL DEALHELP VERDICTโ—CONFIRMED HIGH-RISK ENTITY


This is no longer:


“Bad reviews”

“Complaints”

“Allegations”


๐Ÿ‘‰ This is:


โœ… Admitted misconduct

โœ… Regulatory penalties

โœ… Investor harm exposure

โœ… Direct financial ties to LendingArch


๐Ÿ›‘ Consumer Warning (Simple Version)


If you're considering using LendingArch:


โš ๏ธ Understand:


It is a lead-generation platform (not a lender)

It has documented ties to a securities misconduct case

It received funds from undisclosed internal transactions


๐Ÿง  What You Should Do Instead


โœ”๏ธ Apply directly with known lenders

โœ”๏ธ Avoid platforms that resell your data

โœ”๏ธ Verify who actually funds your loan

โœ”๏ธ Get a second opinion before signing anything